Migration

Move automations without losing the behaviour that matters

Inventory the current estate, map dependencies, rebuild justified workflows and test parity before a controlled cutover.

Migration

Choose the migration direction

Only routes that have passed the current publication gates appear here.

Specific migration directions remain in reviewed planning until their route, evidence and delivery scope are approved. Start with the current estate and the reason to move.

How to choose

Move the workflows that justify moving—not every automation by default.

Migration starts with a credible operational or economic reason, then an inventory of the behaviour people currently rely on.

Decision boundary: The source workflow remains authoritative until the agreed target behaviour, rollback route and cutover checks have been verified.

  1. 01
    Establish the reason to move

    Check cost, reliability, control, maintainability, access or support ownership—not a generic preference for a newer tool.

  2. 02
    Inventory the estate

    Record triggers, filters, paths, credentials, code, run history, manual work and business criticality.

  3. 03
    Map the behaviour behind each connector

    A familiar app or node does not prove equivalent data, timing, retry or error behaviour.

  4. 04
    Test parity and release carefully

    Agree normal, failure and replay cases; then plan cutover, observation and rollback before retirement.

  5. 05
    Decide when staying put is better

    Keep a working system when the expected benefit does not outweigh the change and operating burden.

One way the work can move
Automation migration services: how the work can moveInventory → dependency map → rebuild → parity test → controlled cutover → observation
  1. 01Input
    Inventory the source

    Important behaviour is spread across triggers, filters, credentials, code steps and undocumented operator habits.

  2. 02System
    Map dependent behaviour

    Inventory → dependency map → rebuild → parity test → controlled cutover → observation

  3. 03Decision
    Rebuild the justified scope

    The source workflow remains authoritative until the target passes agreed parity and rollback gates.

  4. 04Human check
    Approve the cutover

    A superficially successful rebuild misses a filter, duplicate rule or exception path.

  5. 05Verified state
    Observe and reconcile

    A controlled migration with an inventory, mapped behaviour, parity tests, cutover plan and handover.

Not sure which route fits?

Describe what happens now. The service label can come later.

The source page and intent remain attached to the request so the first review starts with useful context.

Discuss your migration